Login
Use your Google account or an Open ID to login.



Copyright © 2010 Stoptheweir.com. All Rights Reserved.
Joomla! is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL License.
Stoptheweir.com
Diane Bell - Edwards Square, Murray Bridge, Jan 17 2008 PDF Print E-mail
Tuesday, 20 January 2009 01:25

Speech by Diane Bell, Edwards Square. Murray Bridge Rally. January 17, 2009


img_0404.jpgThank you for the invitation to speak here today.  Congratulations to the organisers and welcome to all who travelled here for the walk across the bridge and rally.

I pay my respect to the Ngarrindjeri on whose ruwi we meet and with whom we stand strong in our struggle to save the mighty Murray, Lakes and Coorong.

Greetings from the River, Lakes and Coorong Action Group and the Finniss Catchment Group.  Yesterday in Murray Bridge I was talking with the Wellington to Mannum LAP group and was struck by how important it is that we carry the message together from the Murray Mouth to Canberra.  “Fresh water for a living River.” 

This is not just a local issue. The future of the Murray should be of concern to all Australians.  It is our River, a living River, and living systems do not survive when we cut them into little pieces and neither do communities.

It is death by a thousand cuts. Here are some of them.

  • A weir below Wellington. We’re still waiting for the Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) to be released but that hasn’t stopped the SA Government from cutting it up a bit more and seeking approval for a road to be built across the sand-spit from Nalpa Station to Pomanda Island.
  • Salt into the lakes. It’s good that Federal Minister Peter Garrett is requiring a full EIS but the failure of the Government to communicate effectively what they know to be true – the lakes are a predominantly fresh water environment and have been for some 7,500 years – has fostered divisions within the local community.
  • The bund across the Narrows is silting up. If you want to see the risks of another weir, have a look at that. Lake Albert is designated a “terminal wetland”.  Chop it off!
  • Proposals for engineering solutions in the Goolwa Channel – supposedly to protect the environment but these weirs will just further chop up the system.

 

As a community we have sat down and figured out how to respond to each new proposal. We have offered thoughtful input. We are concerned that no short-terms actions are taken that will impede a fresh water recovery.

We’ve been running a do-it-yourself campaign. Just hop onto our website www.stoptheweir.com to learn more. Pick up a post card. Pop on a shirt. Participate in one of our musical extravaganzas.

img_0409.jpgThe SA Govt has been stressing the dangers of Acid Sulfate Soils and has been promising consultation but all we get is pamphlets and power point presentations – no engagement, no sustained exchanges, monitoring not remediation, no whole of system plan. Policy is being made by popularity polls.

Well it won’t do. We’ve been writing together, singing together, planting and mulching together.  We have produced a 10 point “Low Intervention Action Plan”.

It begins by stating that the problem is over-allocation. The drought is bad but this is a country of drought and flooding rains. We see signs of recovery all around us. The July August rains last year kept the country fresh. New life appeared through the acid sulfate soils, fish spawned. Let’s invest in life. Cost plans for bioremediation (planting and mulching) as you have done with weirs.

On Thursday in Goolwa Minister Karelene Maywald said she wanted a fresh water solution - not salt water and not more weirs - but she says she has to plan for the worst case scenario.

Well we can make it very simple for you.  There is at least 200 GL on the market that could be bought tomorrow. For around $70 million you could buy it. Senator Penny Wong has $200 million. Invest it in the future of South Australia.

The government has purchased the water for critical human needs. What about critical environmental needs?

“Where is the Water Audit?” Senator Nick Xenophon asked. He sends greetings from Canada where he is working on our behalf to learn more of their Carbon Pollution Reduction Scheme. As Nick has pointed out: How can decisions be made before the water audit has been publicly reported? It exists. Can we please see it? Minister Maywald said she would get back to us on Thursday. Still waiting.

img_0423.jpgSo let us do the balance sheet here. A string of temporary weirs, dredging at the Mouth, pumping of salt water, pumping at Lake Albert, fish kills, stranded migratory birds, rotting vegetation, Australia shamed internationally for destroying a Ramsar site.

The weir below Wellington will cost in excess of $250 million and that is a temporary weir. It will sink. The new pool will become stagnant. Algal blooms are coming to a site near you. Salinity will increase and move up river. 

The price tags on the weir proposals for the Goolwa Channel range between $11.5 and $100million. They are also said to be temporary.

Minister McEwen, I congratulate you on all that has been achieved.

Yes the new Murray Darling Authority is a step forward but only if it can act as a national body in the interests of all Australians and actually deliver an outcome, not just more bureaucracy. Yes, the investment in pipelines has secured water for communities around the lakes but they have also taken the pressure off the government to get fresh water to keep the lakes healthy.

My fellow citizens, what we do this year may be the most important thing we do in our lives.  It is up to us to make sure our children and grandchildren have a River, Lakes and Coorong. Please join me in demanding action. Stop telling us the water isn’t there or that there are too many impediments to getting it here.

Stop telling us water evaporates. Of course it does. It’s called the water cycle. It’s not peculiar to Lake Alexandrina.

Minister, I ask that you commit to purchase that water.

No more excuses. 

Vision, leadership and courage. 

It can be done.

As the Beatles may have sung: “All we need is fresh water La, la, la , la ,la.”



Diane Bell

Last Updated on Sunday, 25 January 2009 05:30
 
COMMENTS FROM COMMUNITY MEMBERS IN RESPONSE TO THE DWLBC DISCUSSION PAPER PDF Print E-mail
Thursday, 15 January 2009 11:00

http://www.dwlbc.sa.gov.au/assets/files/proposed_refuge_project.pdf

Imagine: Think of our environment. What will the river, lakes and Coorong look like in a few years, if plans for weirs and seawater flooding proceed?

All things are connected: Complex problems cannot be solved by chopping them into pieces, but this is what the SA Government strategy is doing. Lake Alexandrina and Lake Albert are to be sacrificed. Where is the plan for the whole system?

A freshwater solution? Where in the options is there a push for more fresh water? There is talk of a freshwater ‘recovery’ but no explanation of how that will be achieved. Fresh water could be brought down in stages.

1000GL of fresh water? The immediate requirement is much less to maintain the lakes above crisis levels without engineering or seawater solutions (175GL in addition to the prescribed 350GL of dilution flow already allocated would see us through to winter 2010.) A level of 0.3m or less would save water and still be consistent with maintaining a viable ecological community in the lake.

Consultation means engagement, not instruction: The proposals will affect all who live around the lakes and Coorong. Why are these meetings being held only in Clayton and Goolwa? Why so are they so late in the decision-making process? Why has local knowledge not been sought throughout the process?

Alternatives: There are alternatives to engineering solutions, but they are being downplayed. The Common Sense Community Action Plan (CSCAP) developed by the River, Lakes and Coorong Action Group Inc. was intended as an alternative. Some elements of this plan have been incorporated into DWLBC options; others have been ignored. The CSCAP is consistent with the response of Ngarrindjeri people, who do not support any options for a weir in the Goolwa channel.

Bioremediation: In keeping with the Discussion Paper’s dictum that we should address the most pressing issues first, base decisions on science and avoid irreversible damage, the first action should be to proceed with planting on exposed shores. Why is this not being funded and fast-tracked? Community groups have begun their own bioremediation actions and are planning more.

Benefits: The Discussion Paper muddles the need to protect the environment through the drought (that is, to maintain a capacity for recovery) with ‘benefits’ that would flow from the proposed weirs. Benefits claimed for silver perch are fanciful because they do not occur in that area. Orange-bellied parrots are transient visitors at best.

Drought and over-allocation: The Discussion Paper acknowledges that the crisis was apparent two years ago, but also claims that it has not been possible to plan a response before this. In fact, the signs of crisis have been accumulating for years. Drought is blamed and over-allocation is not mentioned.

Ramsar: South Australia has never met its Ramsar obligations in this region, and will move further away from doing so if the engineering plans are enacted. Australia will be shamed internationally.

Acid sulfate soils and acidification: Acid sulfate soils are widespread in the region but they can be treated. Some are self-remediating, and local people report signs of natural regeneration all around the lakes. Where are the high-risk spots and how are they are being remediated? Again, why are methods for bioremediation not being implemented now? Where is the plan for dealing with ASS during and after recovery?

Unintended and unknown consequences: A weir(s) would have adverse environmental effects including water quality problems (nutrients, algal blooms, salinity), sedimentation, impeded fish passage and lake circulation. Inadequate understanding of the impacts is acknowledged in the Discussion Plan (e.g. models incomplete, triggers not established, plans not finalised, increased salinity, seepage, ground water and connectivity little understood; removal of all materials not possible). Would these effects be offset by the claimed benefits?

Stream communities can survive: Allowing the streams to disconnect is a better management option than another weir(s). The flora and fauna are adapted to low summer flows. Some invertebrates move away; others retreat to the subsurface gravel. Fish, frogs, crayfish and other fauna are able to survive in pools, although they would benefit from protection (e.g. exclusion of alien fish, especially carp, invasive plants, grazing stock, diversions, isolation of acid sulfate soils). Intermittent streams are quickly recolonised when flow resumes. Sub-populations of two EPBC fish species (Murray hardyhead, Yarra pygmy perch,) are understood to be held in captivity, for later translocation.

The ‘assumptions’ in the Discussion Paper are not reflected in the options provided. The standard for assessments in the Discussion Plan is “best guess”. Is this good enough, when the risks are so great?


15 January 2009

Last Updated on Friday, 16 January 2009 22:51
 
Public Consultation Workshops PDF Print E-mail
Tuesday, 13 January 2009 23:56

There are public consultation workshops at Goolwa and Clayton on Thursday 15 Jan concerning proposals to put weirs into the river channels around Clayton and Goolwa.

Times are:

GOOLWA Thursday, 15 January 2009 9am - 12pm
Centenary Hall, Cadell Street

CLAYTON Thursday, 15 January 2009 2pm - 5pm
Clayton Bay Community Hall

This might be the only consultation.

Try and get to one or both meetings.

The discussion paper is here. proposed_refuge_project.pdf

Last Updated on Wednesday, 14 January 2009 00:02
 
Our Plan PDF Print E-mail
Wednesday, 07 January 2009 19:52

 A COMMON SENSE COMMUNITY ACTION PLAN

for the Lower Murray, Lakes and Coorong

We advocate the return of fresh water end of river flows. Until this occurs, we propose a low inter­vention strategy to reduce the risk of acid­ification and allow nature to recover. The looming crisis requires a rapid response but not one that destroys the ecosystem recognised as a Wetland of International Significance under the Ramsar Convention.

A Low Intervention Strategy

1.   Work with local communities
2.   Respect local knowledge of the Ngarrindjeri people, local fishers, farmers and
      environmentalists
3.   No weirs, no sea water
4.   Invest in mitigation especially in high risk areas, by planting, mulching
      and liming and by limiting access to ensure minimal soil disturbance
5.   Maintain sanctuaries for freshwater and terrestrial  flora and fauna
6.   Protect endangered species
7.   Reduce diversions from tributary catchments
8.   Urge Adelaide to accept more water restrictions
9.   Bring water from the northern Basin
10. Protect the Coorong and Lake Albert

Government Vs Community Plan

clayton_weir.jpg_dsc1384.jpg

Last Updated on Wednesday, 07 January 2009 20:35
Read more...
 
Happy Christmas from the SA Government PDF Print E-mail
Saturday, 27 December 2008 08:11

A new Referral re the Pomanda Island weir was posted on Christmas Eve. Comment from the public is due by Jan 9. The RLACAG will be meeting on Jan 7 to discuss their response. Watch this space for details.

2008/4674: Department of Environment and Heritage (SA)/Transport - land/Pomanda Peninsula, Lake Alexandrina, south of Wellington/SA/Upgrade of causeway to enable access to proposed temporary weir, Pomanda Island

http://www.environment.gov.au/cgi-bin/epbc/epbc_ap.pl?name=invitation_to_comment&limit

Happy New Year from the Federal Government
The Federal Minister's (Peter Garrett) decision on the Referral re bringing salt into the lakes will probably come down Dec 31.

Consultation
Two public workshops will be held on January 13, one at Goolwa and one at Clayton. This will be an opportunity to hear about plans for the Finniss River, Currency Creek and Goolwa Channel.

In the meantime if you have questions, direct them to Andrew Beal (DWLBC) This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it and/or Dean Brown (Chair of the LRMDRG - Lower River Murray Drought Response Group) This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it

Last Updated on Saturday, 27 December 2008 08:12
 
<< Start < Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next > End >>

Page 5 of 20
.